KAL Sure Stevia Extract Powder, Low Carb, Plant Based Stevia Sweetener, Great Taste, Zero Calories, Zero Sugar, Low Glycemic & Perfect for a Keto Diet, 60-Day Guarantee, Approx. 1820 Servings, 3.5oz

This is the best Stevia ever and those that say it’s not are crazy🤗. Great stuff..The case is amazing and you don’t have to use very much it lasts forever. The price might be a little bit, but the fact it last forever, the price is nothing but a thing👍

This is the best Stevia I have tried. I love that it takes a tiny scoop to sweeten my latte. I always loved plenty of sugar in my lattes. But I found out recently that I am diabetic. So goodbye sugar hello sugar substitutes. I tried Truvia, Stevia in the Raw and the Walmart brand Stevia. They were better than the pink, blue and yellow envelope powders but not quite a replacement for sugar. In fact Stevia in the Raw contains a natural sugar bulk which is 100 on the glycemic index which is no good for diabetics. I found this concentrated pure Stevia and tried it. This is just like sugar but you need about 1/100 the amount to sweeten a large latte. I tried it in straight espresso and it works great also. The pros: no bitter after taste, 0 on the glycemic index, 0 carbs, 0 calories, takes just a very minute amount to sweeten, there are 2381 scoops of powder in this one container, it will last a very long time, it is cheaper in the long run than all the other sugar substitutes and it actually has medicinal properties good for the pancreas. I will be trying it in cereals and deserts soon and I am confident that I will love it there also.UPDATE:I have to admit when I saw the maltodextrin on the label I became concerned. I read that someone called the company and they said that since they process it using the same machines they process the maltodextrin they have to list it as an ingredient since it may contain traces of it. So I checked it by simply using it in the same amount as the original I still had without the maltodextrin on the label. There was absolutely no difference in the sweetness it imparted to the drink. Since maltodextrin is in no way near as sweet as pure stevia, if it had significant amounts of it the new powder would not sweeten as much as the original pure powder. Maltodextrin is really bad for diabetics if used to cut the stevia considerably like they use it in Stevia in the Raw where you have to use a spoonful of it to sweeten a drink. However, maltodextrin is not poison. And in these trace amounts it is not bad for diabetics either. I understand that pure stevia is not in such great demand to dedicate process equipment only to it.

Pure Stevia tastes like to sugar. No aftertaste, no residue. What more could you ask for?A TRUE REPLACEMENTAfter 60 years, I've broken my sugar addiction. Before pure Stevia, I used Splenda and later Truvia/Purevia (Stevia cut with bulking agents) for several years. The Truvia/Purevia were better than Splenda, but both the Splenda and Truvia/Purevia left disgusting residues and just didn't taste right (because of the fillers or bulking agents added). More importantly for me, I could not fully enjoy my gourmet coffee with either. When I first began using pure Stevia, I appreciated the better flavor and lack of a residue, but it still did not taste quite like sugar to me. However, after 6 months of pure Stevia, it tastes like sugar to me, and I am again enjoying gourmet coffee.Perhaps more precisely, pure stevia is "as effective" as sugar for "cutting the edge" of bitter or sour drinks and foods---the way most people use sugar. However, it is not as intensely sugary-sweet, regardless of how much you use. For a rare, once-a-month "desert" cup of fine coffee, I still use real sugar and real cream. However, at least for my tastes, Splenda tastes better in lemonade than stevia.COMPARISON TO SWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDERSWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDER contains the natural fiber Inulin as a bulking agent. KAL STEVIA POWDER does not. The Inulin does not seem to affect the flavor nor leave a yucky residue (as do the nasty bulking agents in Truvia/Purevia). Possibly due to the Inulin, SWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDER dissolves easier thand KAL STEVIA POWDER. SweetLeaf Stevia Powder, 4-Ounce Shaker Jars (Pack of 2)MEASUREMENTOne "tiny spoon" (included) of KAL STEVIA POWDER = 1 teaspoon of surgar. 1 level teaspoon of SWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDER = a moderately heaping teaspoon of sugar.CAUTIONInulin is a polysaccaride sometimes used as a sugar substitute itself (for diabetics). It has about 1/4 to 1/3 the sweetness of sugar, and about 1/4 to 1/3 the caloric content---which I interpret to mean the same calories for the same sweetness (however, in this case much of the sweetness is contributed by the Stevia). Inulin is a current food fad, with the usual (probably greatly exaggerated) claims of benefits, including improving digestion, reducing cholesterol, particularly triglycerides, protection from intestinal cancer, etc. On the other hand, it causes digestive problems in some people. I suggest reading the Wikipedia article. If (like me), you don't have digestive problems with inulin, and it sounds as though the various benefits may be significant for your particular health problems---I suggest arranging for blood tests after a month of using inulin, and a month after not using inulin to compare. I plan to do this.EASE OF USESWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDER and KAL LIQUID STEVIA are easier to measure than KAL STEVIA POWDER, because the KAL STEVIA POWDER is much more concentrated. However, the KAL STEVIA POWDER comes with a tiny spoon which I find works perfectly well for measuring stevia for my coffee. However, the KAL STEVIA POWDER is so concentrated that it is difficult to evenly sprinkle over a sliced fruit dish. Pure Stevia Liquid Extract - 4 oz - LiquidSWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDER dissolves easier than KAL STEVIA POWDER. That is not a problem for hot drinks, but SWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDER or KAL LIQUID are preferable for cold drinks, such as iced tea or limonade. I also find that unsweetened fruit cups etc. are just too sour for my taste---a few drops of the KAL LIQUID STEVIA makes them perfect.ECONOMY$15.22 for 2 4oz bottles of SWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDER versus $18.44 for 1 3.5 oz of KAL STEVIA POWDER (the price at the time of this writing, both with free shipping on orders >$25) may seem a bargain, but the KAL STEVIA POWDER is much more concentrated. A 3.5oz jar of KAL STEVIA POWDER claims to hold 2381 servings. A 4oz bottle of SWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDER claims to hold 230 servings (= 460 servings for 2 bottles). The economy of KAL LIQUID is probably similar to SWEETLEAF STEVIA POWDER.I use "3 servings" per mug of strong coffee, so 1 bottle (3.5oz) of KAL STEVIA POWDER = 600 mugs of coffee, to my taste; while 2 bottles (8 oz) of SWEETLEAF STEVIA = 153 mugs of coffee. So, the KAL STEVIA POWDER is clearly the winner for pure economy, but even the SWEETLEAF STEVIA is far cheaper and superior to Truvia/Purevia.CONCLUSIONFor coffee and other hot drinks, KAL POWDER is the most economical. For cold drinks, fruit etc. SWEETLEAF POWDER (or KAL LIQUID) is more convenient.General Recommendation: After major grocery shopping expeditions, sit down at your computer with your reciept, and check if you can buy any of the non-perishables through Amazon. When you find items (even if more expensive than you just paid), put the item on your Amazon wish list, and add a note to the wish list of the price you just paid. Check your wish list frequently, and when you see an item you need at a bargain price, buy it.