Russell Hobbs Desire Electric Fruit & Vegetable Mini Chopper, 1L glass bowl with 500ml food capacity & storage lid, Dishwasher safe parts, Stainless Steel blades, One touch operation, 200W, 24662

So easy to use & very easy to clean. Does everything I want it to do. Simple & effective

Super fast delivery. Cheapest price found. Replaced old one that I'd had for years but the blade broke. It was cheaper to buy a whole new unit. This aid has been a god-send for arthritic hands. A neat size so does not take ipuch room on my worktop. Only criticism is that onions can het stuck to the sides and don't get chopped as fi ely as limed. Highly recommend.

You need to cut vegetables in small chunks before chopping. Does good job with Onions. You need enough quantity for this to work best, less quantity will not give expected output. Sometimes when you want to chop every chunk it starts mincing the smaller pieces and you are left with granules of your veggies. Overall this is helpful and I am use it regularly. Very handy and easy to clean and use.

Wonderful for making breadcrumbs for my Christmas stuffing. My health has been slow to recover from a heart attack so, this mini blender took all the stress out off Xmas cooking. I just put a few slices of stale bread in the blender and in a few minutes I had excellent breadcrumbs! I was so thrilled! 🙏🙏🙏

Very useful kitchen gadget. Must have one. Tried other brands but this is the best in my opinion .

I am delighted with the Russel Hobbs chopper. It looks beautiful in my kitchen. I use it every day when making my meals. It chops onions and tomatoes in seconds and is a dream to rinse out. Some gadgets are more bother than they are worth to use but not this item. The component parts are of very good quality. It represents great value for money. It isn't noisy, either. Five stars.

Chops stuff. It's great. Bought to replace previous model

I've always used the Kenwood mini choppers which work really well but are short lived, due to engine failure or the gears rubbing against the plastic housing, so I thought I'd try a different one and really regret it. Firstly, the glass goblet is bigger than the Kenwood, meaning small quantities are very hard to process as they just get thrown to the outside of goblet. Secondly, the goblet is too big for the very small blades, meaning that most of whatever you are chopping does not come into contact with the blades, especially as there is also a gap beneath the blades so a think layer of food also lies, untouched, on the bottom of the goblet. First I tried to process some oats, which the Kenwood used to reduce to fine powder in seconds but, after many minutes of processing, and having to repeatedly shake the goblet to get all the oats in contact with the blade, I was left with rough, uneven flakes and gave up. Next I tried to puree some steamed parsnip. It took a ridiculous 10 minutes of repeatedly having to stop and stir the contents of the goblet to get all the mixture properly processed. Through the glass of the goblet, you could clearly see that all the parsnip on the outside of the goblet was not moving at all. Again, it would have taken the Kenwood very little time. Food also gets stuck in the underside of the blade component and is almost impossible to clean out. Just poor design and an ineffective product. I am amazed so many people have given it a high score.