War and Peace (Modern Library Classics) Paperback – July 9, 2002

I officially scratched off an item from my bucket list. I read War and Peace in its entirety – and more. I didn’t just read one version. I read and referenced back and forth between two versions of the classic book. I used an ebook version translated by Anthony Briggs and the paperback version from Barnes & Noble Classics series.There were differences between the translations. The language in the digital version is more accessible to the English reader but the structure of the ebook is poorly formatted and distracting in many places. The vocabulary in the paperback version was more challenging, more florid, and the formatting was never an issue.The focus of my review from here on out will be on the book itself. There are many translations out there for readers to choose from. Those are the two I used.War and Peace is an epic tale of Russian life before, during and after Napoleon’s invasion in 1812. I knew little about the time period, the war or the culture in Russia at this tkime but Tolstoy masterfully draws the reader into the world. Despite the various locations, the use of several languages, a host of unfamiliar names and titles, War and Peace is rather easy to follow. I didn’t find it complicated, in that it never lost me. It is complex but I seemed to know where I was and who I was with from page to page. It wasn’t overwhelming.Three chief fictional figures serve as anchors to the massive world building – Pierre Bezukhov, Natasha Rostov and Andrei Bolkonsky.War and Peace is adorned with a full cast of colorful characters. Tolstoy brings us inside their heads as often as the three chief characters, changing POV where it is necessary, providing much needed insight.The most intriguing part of War and Peace for me was the exposition. Tolstoy breaks the fourth wall countless times and speaks to the reader as a professor speaks to students in a classroom. He educates us and he interjects his opinions about the war, about the historical players, and he even critiques others who have critiqued this time period.“All historians agree that the external activity of states and nations in their conflicts with one another is expressed in wars, and that as a direct result of greater or less success in war the political strength of states and nations increases or decreases.”By modern scholarly standards, this exposition would be considered taboo and unacceptable.In War and Peace, Tolstoy has written a history as much as a work of fiction.“History is the life of nations and of humanity. To seize and put into words, to describe directly the life of humanity or even of a single nation, appears impossible.”I for one actually enjoy the digressions and the exposition because I enjoy reading history. I’m not so sure other readers will fancy or appreciate these additions but I did.“The historians quite falsely represent Napoleon’s faculties as having weakened in Moscow...”Tolstoy is telling a unique story of the world as he sees it and doesn’t make anyone a hero or a villain. Napoleon is not portrayed as a monster and the leadership in Russia is not lionized. In fact, he often described the Russian leadership as disjointed, out of touch, and haphazard. It is not the unified, well-oiled machine filled with strategic maneuvers that historians often describe it as. Many of the greatest moves made by Russia were blunders or accomplished due to a lack of communication, even the headstrong actions of vigilantes and incendiaries.Pierre, Natasha and Andrei are flawed characters. Whatever strengths they possess are countered by equally destructive weaknesses. Having seen and loved the classic King Vidor film from 1956, I couldn’t separate, no matter how I tried, Pierre, Natasha and Andrei from Henry Fonda, Audrey Hepburn and Mel Ferrer. As I read, I saw their faces and heard their voices in my head.Not sure if I should commend the filmmakers for this or not.Pierre, with all his obvious quirks and shortcomings, his absentmindedness and debauchery, has always been my favorite character and reading the book did nothing to change this. (Or maybe it’s because Henry Fonda is such a great actor – I don’t know)Pierre’s time as a prisoner of the French, his emotions and thoughts when he thinks he’ll be executed by a firing squad, the long, cold, hopeless journey by foot, his conversations with Platon Karataev, are undeniably my favorite part of the book.“He baked, cooked, sewed, planed, and mended boots. He was always busy, and only at night allowed himself conversation – of which he was fond – and song… Karataev had no attachments, friendships, or love, as Pierre understood them, but loved and lived affectionately with everything life brought him in contact with… He loved his dog.”I was surprised by the Masonic chapters. They were interesting but I’m not sure if they were wholly necessary.I like how the book explored Pierre’s later years, his marriage and children, his growth as a man.The book enhances Natasha’s character in ways I had not anticipated. Natasha’s youth and aloofness disguise a rather complex and intelligent person who suffers from grand illusions and countless disappointments. Although she grows sick in body, she is strong and unique in drive and devotion – eventually.Andrei is intriguing. While he tries to be a successful man, a beacon of nobility and honor, he never quite measures up to the cold expectations of his stern father and wears this failure on his sleeve. He can never seem to find happiness in anything. He is stoic but he doesn’t want to be. His heart years for more than his head will allow. His unhappy first marriage is also a burden and results in one of the most famous lines ever written.“Never, never marry, my dear fellow! That’s my advice: never marry till you can say to yourself that you have done all you are capable of, and until you have ceased to love the woman of your choice and have seen her plainly as she is, or else you will make a cruel and irrevocable mistake.”I think one of the best features of Andrei’s character is his inability to change. His ideals, his concepts of virtue and goodness are so ingrained in him, they actually strangle him and inhibit him throughout. It is difficult for him to adjust and lighten up, take risks in social settings, to step out and try things beyond tradition. And when he does, he is injured to his heart and retreats back inside his shell of convention.The book provides the reader with deeper insight into Andrei’s life at Bald Hills, with his father, his sister Maria, and his wife Lisa, as well as the maturation of his son Nikolay.When one reads War and Peace, the world today is put on pause. There is no denying the mastery of storytelling that was Tolstoy. It’s a book everyone should read.

Don't be afraid, take the plunge. Read the book, you will not only be glad you did, you will grow as a human being. I read many works of literature before i read this one, i'm a speed reader, i get through them very fast. I never skim but i can read about a line of text a second without loosing comprehension or the ability to imagine the actions and events as if they were happening in real time. And yet i was intimidated by this book, not because of it's length so much as because we generally have the idea that very long books that are considered classics have to be filled with pages of exposition, you know pages describing a carriage or a sunset or a coffee mug(i'm looking at you dickens!) but i felt it was finally time so i set off to my next challenge, to read war and peace in a month on my hour lunch break. To make a long story short, i finished in about 4.What happened to me? i expected to find pages of prose and essays i could easily get through without having to sub vocalize, I expected to have to dig through mass amounts of extra words and ideas to get to the good stuff, which would motivate me to read at my top level. I expected to be able to get through a few chapters a day. But i miscalculated, instead of wanting to speed up, i found myself slowing down. I found myself reading not as fast, but as slowly as possible, to get the most out of every word. There was very little exposition, essays are only introduced in the later chapters and they add an interesting and vital perspective to the novel and also challenge everything i thought i knew about history.The book is long because it contains so many characters, so many stories, and covers so vast a length of time. But you will be interested every step of the way. It did take the first 100 pages to really get exciting but once i got into the story, i went back and reread the beginning and found i loved every word.I keep referring to this as a book as i feel it transcends genre or convention. is it a novel, an epic poem in prose, a very long essay, it is all of these things, and none of these things.A coworker asked what i was reading and i replied "War and Peace". He asked what it was about and i replied "War and Peace". War and Peace is about war and peace, sorrow and joy, the duality and inevitability of these things in our life. it is about how we affect history, and how history affects us. It asks what makes us move as human beings, and as a society and civilization. It's about everything, i learned and grew so much while reading this. And for one of the longest books in the classic literary canon, it begs to be read again, and again. I have started a lifelong affair with War and Peace. Tolstoy asserts that some unknown and divine force is ultimately behind the moves and actions of men, and that histories greatest heroes are merely tools to this end. If that is so than he himself was one such tool. He has moved me.Don't be afraid, take the plunge. Read the book, you will not only be glad you did, you will grow as a human being. War and Peace is as close to perfection as any man could hope to achieve in this life. This review was not necessary, the name says it all.

Frederik Davidson, aka David Case, was a ubiquitous voice on the audiobooks scene before his death a few years ago. He excites widely varying reactions: some find his languid, rather campy recitations rivetting; others find them merely languid and rather campy to the point of having-to-turn-the-damn-thing-off! Immediately!I think he's highly variable. He tells a good yarn but his penchant for imitating all the various voices of the characters - EVEN young girls - is offputting because he quite often makes a hash of them. Other readers "suggest" the voices; Davidson tries to play all the parts as if he's performing a one-man play.Happily, his reading of "War And Peace" minimizes (comparatively) the annoyance-level. He occasionally messes up: his voice for Dolokhov veers between "aristocratic" and "working-class" depending on the situation and his voice for Pierre is a little too buffoonish for comfort but for me his reading stays on the enjoyable side of "languid" and "campy". Besides, it's such a great story that it's almost impossible to completely ruin. And the price is an amazing bargain.However, try the audio samples to see if you can bear Mr Davidson' style of delivery before parting with your money.