AMD Ryzensets 9 7900 Processor (radeon graphics integrated, 12 cores/24 threads, 65W TDP, AM5 Socket, Cache 76MB, up to 5.4 GHz max boost, wraith prism cooler)

Did i need 12 cores no Did I need the x version no This processor is great yes I could get better gaming performance if id gone for (at the time of purchase) equally prices 7800x yes however I didnt only build my system to game it built so I could game and multitask in comfort which this cpu does perfectly fine it doesn't strain it self and it isnt overkill exactly what I was after

I chose this processor after I read poor reports about issues with intel 13 and 14th gen chipsets. and I built a decent sound studio PC for my daughter with AMD chips. I spent some time reading reviews and felt this was a decent enough chip to future-proof my machine to cater for my purely office needs and hopefully should last me 10 years. My current 9-year-old Win10 box is more than adequate for my needs but is unable to upgrade to Win 11 and the only reason I've built a new machine. I have to say I'm not impressed with Win 11 Pro. This chip along with my ram should allow me to create several virtual machines and run them at a reasonable lick

Super processor. I bought it music production in Ableton live. It can run hundreds of tracks at a time, loaded with plugins and it only shows 50% cpu load! Holy smoke!

I build computers for living so I know a lot about them. What is getting to me I use some of the older AMD fx 64-bit black core edition chips and because of a set of instruction's it simply won't work for windows 11! The last build of 10 yes but not 11. The FX core or CPU is more than capable speed wise it's just a money-making thing. I remember when AMD k2 fitted intel boards vice versa and the AMD was way ahead of time as in speed say intel was 200mhz and AMD was 500mhz fsb and it was cheaper also more stable. Ok we have come a long way since, but prices keep going up socket changes etc. Could go on for ever. I have heard great things about this CPU the ryzen 9 so when fully built will give a review. But just because windows 11 won't work on an am3 fx don't get rid as can run linix so food for thought for some or run on win 10 with latest antivirus and so on. people ask me all the time what the best secure system is! No system is 100% secure and with deep AI it's going to be more challenging let's say. But will give full review after built. Only concerning issue so far, I have read it uses a lot of wattage in oc mode. close to 200w so will see! As for chip comes with cooler looks solid and hope for gaming capability's it has changed in design as amd were stating say a quad core well it has two physical dies cores slit so it sees 4 logical cores. Many thanks. But will state big jump in terms of am3 fx 2013 approximately date of manufacture and ryzen am5 2022 - So multitasking should be a breeze. Thanks again. Well moving on running the Ryzen 9 And omg it's a very fast CPU for money and coupled with enough ram and gpu oh it shifts as in moves run multiple things leaves Amd fx chips on the ground seriously so yeah really happy.

Works well

This processor is incredible. So powerful, yet only 65W and includes an excellent cooler.

Great for Gaming and Multi Threading

very nice

First off, I enjoy building SFF (small form factor) type builds. The current generation of CPU's were more power hungry, which resulted in more heat to dissipate. Trying to cool a Ryzen 9 7900X on a CPU cooler rated for max 100W is quite difficult, so therefore you have to go towards cases like the NZXT H1 V2. This particular chip allows you to not only have near identical performance to the Ryzen 9 7900X with PBO, but also gives you SFF allowable performance at a lower wattage that still provides you power. So far today using this has been great, and I recommend this chip to anyone that wants a newer generation chip without the abismal power draws that have been required as of late. Edit 1/17: From normal use I have seen no difference between this model and the X model. I had both chips in my NZXT H1 V2, liquid metal as the thermal application, and by far the non X model does much better in this type of SFF build. It still will boost, however if you are like me, work from home, and use this all day long in most cases, you aren't going to want the CPU blasting at full power over the entire work day. Quick note: temps are much better, my fan curve was not changed and the temperature is a lot more tolerable compared to the X version, so my CPU radiator fan does not spool up as much as it did with the X. I let it hover between 50C-65C for daily use and the fans are quiet, with the X the fan was at half or more RPM constantly to keep it at around this temperature and would sometimes hover in the 70's. So, if you are temperature concious then the non-x version is great. With that said I am pleased with the product. I do feel though this model needed to be priced at $399, as we have seen the 7900X is selling at this time around $425 on sale. Again, I will reiterate, the allowances in this chip should have been more prevalent in the X version, as I feel like we were kind of ripped off slightly this generation on CPU's and GPU's. Edit 1/20: This will be my final edit. I am boosting to around 5.5 MHz with the wattage anywhere from 60-90W. My temperatures are sustaining on load no more than 68C on a single 140mm AIO in the NZXT H1 V2. This is great, I am maintaining the frequency, but with a much lower power draw. One item I would recommend is getting an aftermarket chip mounting plate for this chip, weirdly it did make a difference for this chip, around 1-2C lower than the stock MOBO chip mount. I'm using the following mount: Thermalright ASF-Black AM5 CPU Holder, Corrective Anti-Bending Fixing Frame, AM5 Full-fit Fixed Non-Marking Mounter, AM5 Anti-Bending Contact Frame, CPU Cooler Standard, I am also using the following paste: Thermal Grizzly Conductonaut Thermal Grease - 1 Gram Set + 3 Applicators + Pads - Liquid Metal Thermal Paste for Cooling The CPU, GPU Value Pack. So far so good, would recommend, and again this is what the first chip should have been - AMD is trying too much to be intel, sure make your server chips, but we buy AMD for efficiency, not brute power in most cases. Sure, there is threadripper, but most of us are casual users. Regardless, this is the chip we all wanted, it's powerful, efficient, and over-clockable.

Sarò alquanto imparziale , utilizzo il processore per programmazione e sviluppo di videogiochi in ambito Unity e anche per il gaming. Il Ryzen 9 7900 è un potente processore a 12 core noto per la sua eccellente efficienza energetica con un TDP di 65W. Pro: Prestazioni multi-core elevate con consumi e temperature molto contenuti. Incluso dissipatore stock (Wraith Prism) adeguato per il TDP standard. Ottimo rapporto prestazioni/watt. Contro: Frequenze operative e prestazioni multi-core inferiori rispetto al 7900X (a parità di prezzo di lancio). Nonostante il TDP più basso, necessita comunque di una scheda madre AM5 con DDR5. Per il prezzo è un ottimo processore ma può puntare molto piu' in alto casa AMD

How it Perfoms? To be fair It's 90% of 13700K with PBO on and if youre lucky with Curve Optimizer + PBO will perform 95% of 13700K. Mine works -20 with PBO easliy and got score of 30k in Cinebench R23. You can try overclocking, but i strongly woudln't suggest it. In comparizon to 7900X3D it's 20% slower in gaming but 10% faster in Productivity tasks and costs 30% less. In Comparizon to 7800X3D it's 20% slower in gaming but 35% faster in Productivity tasks and costs 5% less. So, if u just game then buy X3D chip and forget it. Why You should buy it. Whats it's USP? It's TDP, It will go max 180W to be precise, and will remain under 95'C under worst of worst condition unlike 13700K which easily touches 100'C and consumes max of 253W. If you want to have a GPU with 450W+ TDP like 4090[Now] or say 5090 [in future :P] you can pair it with a >= 650W Gold PSU with this CPU. Use saved money into ssds or whatever.

Bought this for a NAS build. the cpu comes with a cooler in the box (although given the noise and temps I would recommend getting a different cooler). The cpu it's self performs very close to the 7900x if you want to enable pbo and with out it uses very little power which is nice when you're trying to save on power yet still packs a punch.

J'ai été agréablement surpris par le Ryzen 9 7900. Son TDP de 65W est impressionnant pour un processeur de cette catégorie. Il offre des performances solides dans les applications de création de contenu (montage vidéo, rendu 3D, etc.) et permet de jouer confortablement à la plupart des jeux. Le tout avec une consommation énergétique maîtrisée et un fonctionnement silencieux. C'est un excellent compromis entre performance et efficacité énergétique. Points positifs : TDP de seulement 65W : consommation électrique réduite et fonctionnement silencieux. Excellentes performances pour la création de contenu et le gaming. Bon rapport performance/watt. Idéal pour les configurations silencieuses. Points à considérer : Légèrement moins performant que les versions "X" dans certains benchmarks, mais la différence est minime pour une utilisation courante. Conclusion : Le Ryzen 9 7900 est un excellent choix pour les utilisateurs qui recherchent un processeur puissant mais économe en énergie et silencieux. Il convient parfaitement aux créateurs de contenu et aux joueurs qui ne veulent pas sacrifier le confort acoustique.