Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics (Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics)

I was delighted to find an introductory book aimed at students of language written by someone with an eye toward where semantics and pragmatics overlap (I think it's a terrible misfortune that they are separate disciplines). Cruse's 3rd/2011 edition is a wonderful pragmatic-oriented survey of issues in (primarily English) semantics. It gives clear and concise summaries of many important topics (emphasizing lexical semantics, reference, and pragmatic inferences), along with penetrating examples, and--unlike many of its siblings--does not get hung up on idiosyncratic examples or convoluted formalisms. The author has a great sense of humor aimed at those who appreciate wordplay, presumably everyone who would consider reading it.

Easy read and easy to follow.

Great read if you are looking for an an easily understandable book on language and logic. Recommended to anyone looking for a starter book on these subjects.

The book as a lot of awesome detail. The author really gets you into it. It's a great read! Keeps me coming back for more.

Easy to read. Good introduction to present-day semantics of natural language. The final chapter on pragmatics is a bonus, as most texts about general semantics say little about pragmatics.

It deals with a complex subject in a complex way. At times its explanations are opaque for someone who is not conversant with the discipline. Certainly not a book for someone who is looking for an introduction

A good refresher couse from my Semantics class back in Jr. High School. I am spending extra time in working with my Linguistics skills that I took for granted in jr. high school. I will keep you posted as I go along and advance.

語彙意味論、意味論、語用論のテキストである。初版（1999）、第2版（2004）、そして第3版と版を重ねているところを見ると、語彙意味論、意味論、語用論の大学および大学院テキストとして評判が良いからであろう。評者も大学院で使ったことがある。益するところ大であった。たとえば、 1.Britain lies under 1m of snow. 2.Britain mourns the death of the Queen Mother’s corgi. 3. Britain has declared war on San Marino. ではどれも「英国」であるが、細かく見ると１は地理的な「英国」であり、２は英国民としての「英国」であり、３は政治的な「英国」（＝英国政府）である。このような微細な違いはいくら丁寧に辞書を見ても分からない。もう一例をあげよう。 ４. My mother was only two years old when war broke out.この英文は正しいのだが何となく違和感がある。これをうまく説明する用語として「時間を超えた同一人物の普遍性」（constancy of identity over time）を紹介している。などなど。 ただ用例の容認性の判断と意味解釈は著者Cruseの直観的判断であるので、英米人はみな同じ反応をするかというとその保証はない。このことを頭において読む必要があるが、本書にはダイヤモンドの原石がゴロゴロころがっているといっても過言ではない。素晴らしいテキストであり研究書でもある。

My entry to this field came from reading Lakoff, but I had read Murphy (both referenced in Cruse) earlier. I write computer software that consults a real-world ontology (Wordnet), and hopefully will soon construct ontologies automatically by reference to Wikipedia and the like. I found Framenet and Verbnet on the Web but they are of little use. For example, the verb "drive" has a subject that is "animate". True, but far too general. People drive vehicles, whilst dogs drive sheep. And incidentally, pre-amplifiers drive power amplifiers, but these are not animate. So at least 3 polysemes that should be treated separately. So I read books like this one by Cruse (and Pinker, Lakoff, Deutscher, Jackendoff), for clues as to how to write the code. But I am having to make it all up myself. Reading the books should help to lay out the constraints on the solutions. Even when they get deeper than syntax, Linguistic books seem to be stuck with the early stage of checking for "well-formedness". Well, Wikipedia is already well-formed, so this obsession is of little use to me. But this Cruse book seems to inform me. I will now go back to his earlier joint books on Verb Frames.

Muy interesante! . Es conveniente una buena formación gramatical antes de leerlo. Y muchas ganas de aprender, abstenerse sin un buen nivel de ingles.

友達にあげました。 とても喜んでました。

good material for diploma studies